DemDaily: Dreamers Defy Trump
June 18, 2020
Today, in one of the most anticipated rulings of the 2019-2020 term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) blocked the Trump Sdministration's attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, ruling the "total rescission" of DACA "arbitrary and capricious."
"Dreamers" at Supreme Court today after decision (Kimberly Scott/DemList)
SCOTUS' ruling is the culmination of a series of brutal legal and legislative battles that have entangled Congress, the Administration, and the fate of hundreds of thousands, since Trump took office.
The landmark decision is also another major defeat for the Trump Sdministration, following Monday's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, which ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes workplace protections for gay, lesbian and transgender people.
As in Bostock, conservative Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the four liberals on the bench in the 5-4 decision, which held that the government failed to give an adequate justification for ending the federal program.
| Of Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, "We conclude that the acting secretary did violate the [Administrative Procedure Act]," and that the decision to rescind DACA "must be vacated." |
Sotomayor, the Court's first Hispanic Justice, condemned Trump's well-documented animus toward immigrants
In the majority opinion, Roberts noted, "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies...'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of our concern.' We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action."
Accordingly, the high court ruled that the Trump Administration could attempt again to rescind the program, but it would have to provide a better explanation, grounded in policy, for its reason for termination.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a separate opinion on Thursday, criticized her fellow justices for not taking it further by finding that Trump's well-documented comments against immigrants were "an animating force behind the rescission of DACA," therefore violating their equal protections under the US Constitution.
In his dissenting opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas called the ruling a 'timid' effort to avoid a 'controversial' decision" (CBSNews)
Although immigration reform was a centerpiece of Trump's campaign platform, his inhumane detention and caging of children and families at the US border, including those attempting to flee violence in their native countries, have been met with extreme backlash.
Public support for DACA has continued to rise, making it unlikely that Trump will pursue further action this close to the presidential election.
| A June 4-10, 2020 poll conducted by the Pew Research Center, 74% of the adults surveyed said they would be in favor of a law giving Dreamers permanent legal status in the US |
In June of last year, the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 6, the American Dream and Promise Act, which would prohibit removal proceedings against certain immigrants and provide them with a path to permanent resident status. The bill, however, has been held up in the Republican-controlled US Senate.
In a call this afternoon with the Democratic political leaders, Texas Congressman Filemon Vela, who represents parts of 11 counties on the US-Mexico border, said "our pathway to making this permanent, our pathway to comprehensive immigration reform... is all about winning the Senate and taking the presidency."
Children held in caged Customs and Border facility near El Paso, Texas (Ivan Acquirre/Texas Tribune)
Home Is Here Coalition: Take Action
DemList will keep you informed.
DemList
Connecting you to The Party
Connecting you to Each Other
Kimberly Scott
Publisher
Please Support DemList
Sources: SCOTUSblog, CNN, Law & Crime, Newsweek
